Not All Shilajit Is the Same: What the Purity and Composition Research Shows

A 2025 chemical analysis of a single raw shilajit sample, collected directly from a monk's own preparation in northern India, found that 57.69% of its dry weight was mineral ash, not organic compound of any kind. That means at most 42% of that sample could have contained fulvic acid, dibenzo-alpha-pyrones, or any of the other compounds shilajit is actually sold for. Below is the research behind why shilajit composition varies so widely, and what that means for anyone comparing products.
What is shilajit actually made of?

Shilajit forms over centuries as plant and microbial matter decomposes under pressure in high-altitude rock formations, then seeps out as a sticky, mineral-rich resin. A classic composition review by Agarwal and colleagues describes it as a complex mixture of humic substances along with plant and microbial metabolites, not a single isolated compound.
The organic fraction that research has focused on most includes a few named components:
- Fulvic acid, a small-molecule humic substance that research has tied most consistently to shilajit's mineral-binding and antioxidant activity
- Humic acid, a related but larger and less bioavailable compound, found in overlapping but distinct amounts
- Dibenzo-alpha-pyrones, a group of compounds also called urolithins, which later research has connected to antioxidant activity
- A wide mineral profile, since the resin forms embedded in mineral-rich rock over very long timescales
- Plant-derived phytochemicals, carried over from the organic matter that decomposed to form the resin in the first place
That list makes clear why two products both labeled shilajit can be meaningfully different substances depending on how much of each fraction survived collection and processing.
Why the ratio of these components is not fixed
- Source geology varies. Mineral content and contaminant exposure differ by mountain range, altitude, and specific rock formation.
- Collection method matters. Resin scraped directly from rock seepage carries far more inert mineral sediment than resin filtered and concentrated afterward.
- Processing determines what survives. Heat, filtration, and purification steps can raise or strip the proportion of fulvic acid, humic acid, and other organics relative to mineral ash.
- Testing standards are not universal. Not every supplier publishes a verified fulvic acid percentage, which means label claims are not always independently checked.
What did a real chemical analysis of raw shilajit find?

In 2025, researchers at AIIMS Rishikesh and IIT Roorkee ran a full chemical workup on 50 grams of raw shilajit, self-prepared and sourced from a monk in Uttarkashi, India, and published the results in ACS Omega. The findings are specific:
- Total ash made up 57.69% of the sample's dry weight, meaning mineral residue, not organic compound, was the single largest component by far
- Acid-insoluble ash was 33.3%, pointing to rock and sediment that did not dissolve even under acidic conditions
- Potassium and calcium dominated the mineral content, consistent with other published shilajit elemental analyses
- The sample's own GC-MS chemical screen, a method that separates and identifies individual compounds, found 37 identifiable compounds, none of which were fulvic acid or dibenzo-alpha-pyrones, even though the paper's own abstract mentioned those compounds as having been identified
That last point matters more than it might first appear. The study's methods and data table tell a more conservative story than its own summary suggests, which is exactly the kind of gap a careful reader, or a careful supplier, has to catch rather than take on faith.
What this one analysis does and does not prove
- It is a single raw sample from a single source, not a survey of the shilajit market broadly
- It has no bearing on any specific commercial product, since it was self-prepared by an individual rather than commercially processed or purified
- It is not a safety or efficacy test of any kind. It is a compositional snapshot of what unprocessed resin can contain.
- It does demonstrate, concretely, that raw shilajit is not automatically a concentrated source of fulvic acid, which is the assumption much of the raw-resin market relies on
Why does fulvic acid content matter so much?
Fulvic acid is the component most research attention has focused on, for a specific reason: it is the compound most reliably measured and most consistently connected to shilajit's documented biological activity in human studies. A 2014 review by Stohs summarizing shilajit's antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and adaptogenic research across human and animal studies repeatedly ties those effects back to the fulvic acid fraction specifically.
That is also why fulvic acid percentage has become the most common quality marker suppliers can point to. A product can state a specific, lab-verified fulvic acid percentage, the kind that can be checked against a third-party certificate of analysis, where other composition claims are harder to independently confirm.
| Material | What it typically contains | Can quality be independently verified? |
|---|---|---|
| Raw, unprocessed resin | High mineral ash content; fulvic acid content unverified and variable, as the 2025 analysis above shows | Rarely, unless independently tested |
| Shilajit standardized to a stated fulvic acid percentage | A known, lab-confirmed proportion of the compound most tied to documented research | Yes, via third-party certificate of analysis |
| Shilajit marketed only by weight or dose, with no fulvic acid figure | Unknown organic content; could range from mineral-dominant to fulvic-acid-rich | No |
How does purification change what you are actually getting?

Purification is not a marketing step. It is a filtration and concentration process that changes the actual ratio of components in the final product. A resin that starts as mostly mineral ash, sediment, and organic matter in unknown proportions can be filtered to concentrate the fulvic acid and other organics while removing inert material and testing for contaminants.
That distinction showed up directly in the human research discussed above. A 2019 placebo-controlled human trial on shilajit and skin collagen genes, led by Das and colleagues, used a standardized, purified resin with a confirmed composition, not raw material of unknown fulvic acid content. That is not an incidental detail. It is the reason the trial's findings can be attributed to a known substance rather than an unverifiable one.
What should you look for in a shilajit product?
A short, evidence-grounded checklist:
- A stated fulvic acid percentage, confirmed by third-party lab testing rather than listed without verification
- Heavy metal testing results, published and available, since mineral-rich resin can concentrate contaminants from its source rock
- Mold and mycotoxin testing, for the same reason, since organic resin stored or processed improperly can develop contamination raw sourcing alone cannot guarantee against
- A named source region, since composition research consistently ties mineral and organic content back to specific geology
- A manufacturer willing to publish its certificate of analysis, rather than asking a buyer to take a label claim on faith
Common questions
Is all shilajit fulvic acid?
No. Fulvic acid is one major component of shilajit, but raw, unpurified resin is mostly mineral ash and rock sediment. One 2025 chemical analysis of a raw resin sample found total ash made up 57.69% of the dry weight, meaning at most about 42% could have been organic compound at all, and that sample's own GC-MS data did not detect fulvic acid despite the study's abstract mentioning it.
Why do some shilajit products seem to do nothing?
Composition varies enormously by source region, processing, and purification method. A product with a low fulvic acid percentage, or one that is mostly unprocessed mineral ash, is delivering a very different substance than a resin standardized and tested to a known fulvic acid content, even if both are labeled shilajit.
What is the difference between raw and purified shilajit?
Raw shilajit is collected directly from rock seepage and can contain a high proportion of mineral ash, sediment, and biological contaminants alongside its active compounds. Purification processes filter and concentrate the resin to raise the proportion of fulvic acid and other active compounds while removing inert material and testing for contaminants like heavy metals.
Does a higher fulvic acid percentage mean a better product?
Fulvic acid content is one meaningful quality marker because it is the component most consistently measured in composition research and most associated with shilajit's biological activity in published studies. A verified fulvic acid percentage from third-party lab testing is a more reliable quality signal than marketing language alone.
How can I tell if a shilajit product is actually high quality?
Look for a third-party certificate of analysis that states a specific fulvic acid percentage and confirms testing for heavy metals and mold toxins. A supplier willing to publish that data is making a verifiable claim rather than an unverifiable one.

See Optimum Shilajit
Optimum Shilajit is sourced from the Altai mountains and standardized to a verified fulvic acid percentage, confirmed by an outside lab, with results for heavy metals and mold toxins posted publicly. See Optimum Shilajit.
See See Optimum ShilajitSources
- Agarwal SP, Khanna R, Karmarkar R, et al. Shilajit: a review. Phytother Res. 2007. PMID 17295385.
- Stohs SJ. Safety and efficacy of shilajit (mumie, moomiyo). Phytother Res. 2014. PMID 23733436.
- Kiren Y, et al. Diterpenoids from mumiyo. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2014. PMID 23609027.
- Basavaraja D, Dhaka P, Panda PK, et al. Chemical analysis of raw shilajit. ACS Omega. 2025;10:57097-57106. PMID 41404054.
- Das A, Datta S, Rhea B, et al. The human skin proteome reveals effects of oral shilajit supplementation on a cohort of middle-aged women. J Am Coll Nutr. 2019. PMID 31161927.